Levis Boys 511 Skinny Jean

Only $29.99 @ Amazon

Rated 4 of 5 Stars by 18 Buyers!

Levis Boys 511 Skinny Jean

good color. Poison is the name of the color, but purple is what color it is. does not bleed in wash. sized like regular jeans, but skinny means tight for the wearer.

Size 14 is the same as 27 waist, 27 length.

The product was shipped promptly and the goods were precisely as expected. Overall, a very satisfying experience.

I purchased 2 pair of these for my 13 year old for christmas and he liked them so much we ordered 2 more pair!!

Both my sons will only wear these jeans. My son loves the way they fit, Levis seem to last longer than most other jeans this highpriced

The Levi skinny jeans are great. My son loves them so much I purchased several pair in all the cool colors. They are a good fit and not “too skinny”.

I bought these for our 10 year old son, and he loves them! The fit is good and the color (purple) is very rich.

They are supposed to be skinny but for a littler 11 yr. old the waist was big. The fit was more like straight leg than skinny, which my son was fine with. To get the length right we had to go with the longer ones and have to belt it is

Amazon needs to be more specific in its product description of the 511 Skinny Fit Jeans. Both Night Run and West are 100% cotton, rather than 99% cotton/1% spandex elastic like the others. The Night Run’s fit was OK, so we held it, but it’s not so comfortable because there ought to be spandex in such a close fit. (Furthermore, the Night Run fabric is light and thin — would work better as warm-weather jeans.) The West color I had to return, because the 100% cotton was too thick, stiff and unyielding for a skinny fit jean. Skinny fit jeans are very uncomfortable without that 1% elastic!

Nice stylish jeans that last. Usually a few months before holes in the knees. Still, would not pays full costly Found them on Amazon for when it comes to half and qualified for free ship. The waist band is very big, even when ‘slouching’. Overall both my son and I are happy.

Lorex Cvc6985u Professional Outdoor Security

Only $90.99 @ Amazon

Rated 4 of 5 Stars by 9 Buyers!

Lorex Cvc6985u Professional Outdoor Security

I bought a different model lorex 150 foot night imagination camera and was surprised at the quality. That camera has beat 60mph winds, snow, and rain without a problem while still manufacturing a clear picture since day one. For that reason I bought the model LOREX CVC6985U and had nothing but good thoughts on my way outside to install this thing.

Thinking in front I decisive to test the camera out before climbing +15 feet in the air and mounting it is That’s when the feel good story came to an end. This camera while producing a very nice picture does not recognize black and grey clothing, so it displays those colors as green. I could not believe it so I changed to another black shirt and it once again showed green. I then panned to a black garbage container and it was black, then I panned to a black grill set and it was black. However, I panned back to my black shirt and it showed green. I then went inside and randomly recorded black images around the house all of which looked fine, however, the conclusion was that once my black clothing was recorded they were green which puzzles me. I then unplugged the cable off a surveillance monitor and ran the cable to a hd tv and same deal. Green Green Green shirts and pants. I may only imagine someone installing this camera and not testing it out and end up giving the police the description of a burglar with a green shirt,green hat, and green pants. Maybe I just have a wrong model. if that is the case, This review will adjust to reflect that once a replacement unit is had. Until then ***TEST*** this camera before you climb up the ladder.

**Update**

Replacement unit was received and the same problem noted above occurs. It was told to me that this model Lorex CVC6985U, was not created with what’s called an IR-Cut off filter mechanism. That means the colors will not be accurate and genuine to life. I wish they would state that on the box as I have and have seen a swell deal of other Lorex cameras and none of them have this issue. This camera is marketed as Day/night just like the rest and on the box it shows a garden, persons in a store, and other outside activities. Nothing however, expresses the fact that black, grey, and other dark colors will display as deafening green because the company decisive to not include a filter on the lens’ of the camera. I have $20 cameras that have this filter. If your a professional and acknowledge how to install this filter on the lens(You may void the warranty) this might be a good camera. However, if your one of the galore D-I-Y’ers keep looking and if your buying a Lorex make certain the camera has a filter installed stock from the factory.

I may affirm previous reviewer’s observation in regards to colors. such a swell deal of black, blue or violet closing appear as several levels of green. The picture is good othervise.

Night visual sensation is good when objects are close and are at the same distance. One of my cameras is mounted over the entrance and is in regards to 8 feet high. The field of view is beautiful level. Night visual sensation is perfect. The other one is mounted when it comes to 10 feet high over my driveway. It gets holding back wall in it is view, at regarding 6 feet away. The wall looks very vivid but the rest of the driveway is very dark. I suspect it is focusing too much on the wall so the rest just fades out.

I install surveillance schemes for various clients galore residential and some commercial. This camera installs in truth nice broad view with a good quality picture and infrared. I have bought good bit of these camera and only two of them have gave me any disturbed One got moisture in the inside of the camera, I opened it enough for it to evaporate so I haven’t had any disturbed Now the most recent one I order the infrared is going out. Now the customer can’t see at night. I hope they can repair it or send me a new one.

This small camera gives a beautiful view of our rear driveway area. Although I have it plugged into an RCA input (using the included BNC to RCA adapter), you’d swear the picture is HIDEF. The night imaginativeness works great also. I highly commend this camera. Setup was very easy.

I’ve found this camera to be perfective for my outside apps The kit cameras that came with my Lorex strategy were 50 degree field of views This one is 79 degrees. Really covers all the area I wanted to cover. Haven’t noticed the color variations mentioned in the other reviews yet. So far, great camera.

This is a great camera. The picture is crisp and the night resourcefulness is good. This is by far my favorite of the four cameras I’ve tested. I find this is best suitable mounted on the corners. I use mine to monitor the rear of my house. As for the colors at night, I’m not too concerned.

I am the security camera installer.

I think this is the best camera for it price.

It has high resolution picture and the excellent colored night vision with regards to 80 fit or more.

I install about 30 cameras and all my customers very happy with the bought

Installed camera. I really don’t mind the colors but it failed after working 6 months. Picture started to look blurred and it got worse until it was unusable. It is possible it is due to water. The camera is under an eve but could get wet assuming rain falls heavily. Very disappointed with this camera, especially since it was bought to replace a lorex camera that arrived faulty in a four camera DVR schemes Since I shipped this out of the US its too expensive to return for warranty.

Update: Raised review to three stars…it was the power adapter that failed. The camera still works. I am keeping the ranking at three stars due to the power adapter failure but think that I would buy more of these cameras due to the field of view they have (quite large)

This camera is perfect just make sure to use Lorex’s high performance cable for better video quality. I noticed a differance in clearity once I changed it from the cable that came with it.

Lorex CBLD100U DIN or BNC Extension Cable for Security Cameras (100 Feet)

Samsung Ec St65 Digital Camera Optical

Only $79.95 @ Amazon

Rated 4 of 5 Stars by 18 Buyers!

Samsung Ec St65 Digital Camera Optical

Let me get started by saying that the only reason I didn’t rate this as 5 stars is because the LCD display is a little dim and very hard to see in bright sunlight. But the photos come out great, even whether or not you have to guess a bit at what you’re aiming at. Indoors is fine, though.

I bought this camera typically to mount on my mountain bike to make high-def videos. It’s small, lightweight and has the tripod mount in the center so the camera will be balanced when I bounce over rocky trails. The video (720p) is very good, but the effigy stabilization doesn’t assist on my bike. In fact I think it’s better without it and then I just rely on post-processing to stabilize it is But I don’t hold that against the camera – it’s a beautiful shaky ride on a the trails, whether it’s mounted on the frame or my helmet. When the video is too shaky to view, I may still grab person frames (using my video editing software, not included with the camera) and use them as photos – the resolution is high enough to put on the web, but not for printing.

The camera doesn’t come with a printed manual. You have to get the manual from the included CD. You may pick one of several dozen languages. It does have a printed quick-start guide to get you going.

The camera records video up to a max of 2GB. The manual says that is when it comes to 9 minutes, but I’ve found it’s more like 11-12 minutes. When you reach the limit, it just stops recording and saves what it has.

As for memory cards, the manual says up to 8 GB micro SDHC is guaranteed; I’ve applied a 16 GB card with no problems. In video mode, the total record time left (based on space on the memory card) is displayed at the top. An 8 GB card contains virtually 45 mintues of 720p video. The 16 GB card holds double, but the battery is only good for regarding an hour of video, so you’ll need a spare to fill 16 GB.

The battery may be removed from the camera, but only way to charge it is in the camera using the included USB cable. It’s not a frequent USB cable, so don’t lose it!

I have taken a good deal of dozen photos with it, altogether outdoors, and they came out very well. At least I didn’t observe any troubles with them. The color, contrast and focus were all good.

In summary, I think this camera is a outstanding bargain! It’s small and easy to carry, beautiful and takes good pictures and video. The only issue I have is that the display isn’t bright enough to see well when outside in the sun.

I have a Nikon SLR and a Canon HD camera for movies, but both are a ache to lug around. I wanted a small, lightweight camera I could keep in my pocket, use largely for shots of people, but wanted a decent optical zoom and video choices Lastly, I didn’t want to invest more than $100. I just got this today and I’m impressed. It looks and feels like a high quality camera, and has an easy interface. It’s small, and light weight. The Nikon, Sony, Canon, and Panasonic models were all either heavier or cost much more for the features. The only thing is it requires a micro memory card so I could not use the ones I already have. An 8 gb is only $12, so, no huge deal. I’d commend this camera. It takes good pictures, too. But, the flash is not idealisti for dark settings.

I purchased this camera as a gift for my roommate’s birthday back in June 2011. Being a photo-hobbyist, she genuinely liked the camera…so I figure I’d take a stab at it and bought one for myself (October 2011, at a local Fry’s Electronics for $79.99 +tax…Best purchase has this right now at $105.99 +tax). It’s a nice upgrade from my Canon Powershot SD1100IS, which was an 8.0 megapixel camera. This is a 13.4 megapixel camera, so it takes finelooking clear pictures. I say 13.4 because the dimensions of the pictures taken at the greatest or most complete or best possible resolution are 4320×3240 (do the math). It is gorgeous high quality but unquestionably not 14.2 MP as advertised. Also, the pictures are 96 dpi. I wish it could’ve been higher.

There are a lot of pre-defined modes for taking pictures, which is great; however, I have not yet came across a way to manually adjust any of these settings, such as white-balance or apeture. Further, most cameras I’ve employed had buttons or a circular knob on the camera to switch amidst picture and video (and other features). This camera’s alter of mode is in the menu, which I find very inconvenient. It does have a pretty cool feature that snaps a picture whenever it detects a smile.

The videos recorded at HD-resolution is okay. Most of my videos so far have a line through them and artifacts throughout. I’m not sure whether or not that’s because the ST65 uses mJPG for videos rather of H.264. In any case, the video files I’ve devised are not one thing to boast about. If any person is interested, the video bitrate is between 17k to 23k.

The camera comes with a USB connector that is used for charging the battery. You can charge it while connected to a computer or you can use a wall-outlet adapter that is included. While the camera is plugged into your computer, you can transfer pictures to your computer, but you cannot use it to take pictures or record a movie. I have not tested that functionality while charging with the outlet adapter.

Overall, I’m disappointed in this camera. I normally do a lot of research before purchasing an electronic products This time, I went by word of mouth. I hope my roommate genuinely enjoys this camera. It is a lot lower quality than her SLR and the only vantage that I can see is that it’s not as clunky as an SLR. I give it THREE stars as it is, at best, an average camera.

A good camera…does everything that I need. Picture quality is very good. Simple to use….battery life is excellent. Would buy again.

We in truth got this camera as a alternate from Samsung for the SL605 model that had power issues, so they sent us this one and let me just say it’s awesome, the pictures are very clear and life like and the 720p HD video is outstanding as well, when we shot the original video and then watched it back, we couldn’t believe the detail it had. This camera has more features than galore of the other brands in it’s price range, it is as well lightweight which makes it easy to travel with. There’s still such a heap of features we haven’t tried yet but at long last we will. I would definately reccommend it to anyone who want’s a great camera with a lot of features for a great highpriced

The LCD screen on this camera is very poor quality, and actually made me worried that the pictures would appear as grainy as the subjects appear on the LCD. After transferring the pictures to a PC, the pictures look much sharper (surprisingly so) than they appeared on the LCD. Colors are not picked up as vibrantly as a higher quality camera, and the contrast is more or less off, but it seems to get the job done at this price point.

For a standalone camera with 5x optical zoom you in truth can’t beat the price point, but I would commend a Canon Digital Elph if you’re looking to take quality photos.

hey Nice camera with Good fair pricing ! in addition came with everything as if i bought it in store. thanks

I love this camera the only thing i dont like is that i dont think there are enough flash options

Just as good as the rest and the price is competitive. Battery doesn’t seem to hold as much charge as my older cannon

Bought this camera in May 2011 and the playback button is no longer working just four months later. Samsung’s “warranty” procedure is exceedingly opaque.

My feeling is just that it is a junky camera.

Sony Slta33l Translucent Technology Panorama

Only $599.95 @ Amazon

Rated 5 of 5 Stars by 35 Buyers!

Sony Slta33l Translucent Technology Panorama

The Sony A33 (A55) Not is not incisively What I expected look with limited eyes the good and not so good

First of all this camera is a outstanding movie camera with neverending automati focus and an good photo camera.

The reason I say good and not swell is because whether or not you intend on shooting in any of the 3 automati modes you are not going to get outstanding photos the same as you would get with a Canon T1I, T2i or canon G10. But the photos are more predictable in automati than with the Canon’s

The kit lens is good, does not have much range but works well even even even although it is a cheap kit lens. Better than the t2i

The body is plastic thence light

The fold down LCD is a winner although a small small.

Viewfinder is a real treat giving you the same read out information as the LCD

Switches automatically back and forth from LCD to viewfinder as you place your eye close or take it away from the viewfinder.

Or you might effortlessly switch amid LCD screen and viewfinder by pushing the LCD/viewfinder button.

If you have a large lens or a lens hood the flash might cast a shadow in your photo

I have large hands but the body is very comfortable to hold

Controls are easy to reach but again these cameras are are far to elaborated than they need to be need, but that is where engineering science takes you.

I did not see the battery life as being an issue – My G10 is much better.

Charging takes 4 hours per battery so get yourself a another battery and perchance an extra charger.

I quintessentially bought the a33 because I did not want the GPS sucking the life out of my battery as I learned on a Panasonic Z10.

My travels do not take to normal tourist information base gps way points so I felt it was of no use to me. Another thing to break down

Used Minolta AF lenses work outstanding and are half the price as new Sony ones and are of equal or superior quality. a heap of of the Sony lenses on Amazon are just rebranded Minolta lenses.

The a33 and a55 uses Steadytshot an in camera stabilization

Lenses for this camera are not stabilized which is good and bad

Good because the lenses are fewer expensively and lighter

Bad because the stabilization in the camera is not as reliable as say Canon

When you take a photo you cant just press the shutter all the way down quickly.

You have to press halfway wait for the steadyshot indicator to drop to one bar, wait for the focus beep and then press all the way

Canon seems quicker?

The A33 could be fewer noisier (photo wise not sound wise) than the a55 because it packs fewer pixels on the same size sensor

An Azden SMX-10 mic $65 from Amazon is a outstanding accessory. It takes the mic out of the body to minimize the focus noise of the lenses and adds stereo.

Alert the hot shoe on this camera is a proprietary one meaning you need an adapter to hook on a regular shoal For $12 the Seagull SC-5 Hot Shoe Adapter to frequent Flash Shoe with PC Connection – for Konica Minolta Maxxum & Sony Alpha Digital SLR Cameras works from Amazon

At with regards to 10 minutes of using the video it shuts down from overheating and you might not film until it cools and then it will only go for a few minutes and will shut down again. I luckily only shoot short clips so it is not an issue but Sony made a statement below.

Sony has issued a statement concerning an overheating issue with the new Sony A55 and A33 translucent mirror cameras.

The problem arises from the CMOS sensor overheating in sure temperature ranges. Sony has put together a chart that provides an idea of max recording times underneath sure environmental conditions. You may check it out on the web. They have no resolution only shoot fewer than 10 minutes with stabilization on.

Image stabilization is a large problem for shooting long clips.

5D Mark II and 7D cameras shutdown from overheating in addition so it’s not one thing unique to Sony.

This review could in addition be for the a55 since they are nearly identical accept for a55 —

* gives you more rapidly ceaseless shooting,

* GPS

* higher megapixel.

* price

and a few other minor things

I have come to admire this small piece of techno. I have so numerous Minolta lenses that I purchased from ebay that I have purchased a second a33 so I need to give it a 5 even altho there is invariably room for improvement and nothing is perfect.

On Ebay you may get a

Minolta 50MM F/1.7 prime for circa $73

Minolta 100 mm f/2.8 Macro The sharpest lens Minolta has ever made for fewer than $300

Minolta 100-300 APO Zoom $220

Be heedful of the new 8mm Fisheye from Korea that is marketed for Sony underneath dissimilar names for $230-$330 It is not compatible with a33 or a55

I’ve been using the a33 for when it comes to a week now, strictly testing all distinct elements of the camera as well as pushing the new tech (SLT) to it is limits in both video and high-speed shooting. I look at myself a prosumer, presently using Canon 7D. In fact, I’ve been using canon for the past 10 years. With the recent hype regarding large sensor video functionality found on almost all new releases, I found myself craving for a more functional AF in DSLRs. Because I’m no pro videographer, manual focusing (follow focusing) is terribly difficult for me, specially for high speed, erratic subjects like my kids running around the backyard. And contrast AF found on most DSLRs is a jokes Then came the SLT technology. A fixed mirror that feeds AF info constantly to consecrated AF sensor full-time, even when shooting video. For the price comparable with other entry-level DSLR’s, it sounded like a worthy investment. And being competent to shoot 7fps (10fps for a55) with that uninterrupted phase-detection AF on a body that sells for 650 – surely a head-turner whether or not you’ve been following the DSLR trends the past couple of years.

Well, Sony was capable to deliver most of it is promises. And I was pleasantly astonished by it is PDAF video capability. However, as with all things in life, all that glitters is not gold. There are surely restrictions with this camera, exceptionally noticeable/annoying whether or not you’re a prosumer level user. I will not go into details when it comes to the specs. Those may be found by just googling “sony a33″. And I will not go into in-depth review either. in all probability the best source for that is dpreview.com or imaging-resource.com. I will only list the limitations I found using this camera from a user who’s been using Canon line (currently the 7D). Don’t get me wrong. Overall the camera does deliver in most everything it promises to do (and thus, 4 star rating). All the positives have been pointed out over and over again on assorted reviews you read online, so I just don’t feel the need to repeat them again. I just wanted to point out the major issues that I experienced first-hand. These may be of significance to those who are thinking when it comes to becoming this camera based on it is new engineering science engineering science applied science original and foremost, battery life is a jokes I guess because the camera is on a live view mode full time, it is inevitable to use up more power than conventional dslr, but sony should’ve took this into consideration. On paper, a33 is shortlisted to take when it comes to 340 images using the LCD (about 270 with EVF), but with a small bit of video and looking through the menus to configured dissimilar functions, the battery gets drained VERY VERY QUICKLY. how bad? On a totally charged battery, I’ve turned on the camera, set the time/date/location info, entered my shooting preference, then took the initial shot and with regards to 40 sec video. It was at 83%. Not kidding. After with regards to 2 hours of intense use, it was beautiful much depleted. That’s how fast the power goes. But YMMV since battery life depends on a lot of dissimilar factors. I never genuinely had to think when it comes to whether my particular way of shooting would use up more power than primary because all of the DSLR’s I’ve utilized to date, I never once had to worry when it comes to draining the power quickly. But now it is just one more thing I need to keep in mind. Another thing to keep in mind is that this battery takes regarding 4 to 4.5 hrs to completely recharge, much longer than most others.

2) No devoted RAW/JPEG conversion. whether or not you’re moving up from compact and only use JPEG, this is a non-issue. But whether or not you are half severe in regards to your IQ and PP, then you’ll most likely want to use RAW. The reason why a dedicated button to switch RAW/JPEG is so important, IMO, is because all of the imagination new modes – automati HDR, Panorama, Handheld Twilight mode, high ISO capture – may only be accessed in JPEGs only. Either Sony ought to include these potentially useful functions in RAW, or at the very least require to include a dedicated button to swtich format quickly and efficiently. For me to access sweep panorama, for example, would require me a minimum of 12 button presses. Another thing to keep in mind is that the menu perpetually defaults to the initial share of the shooting menu each time. It does not stay at the menu you last utilized as with Canon cameras. So whether or not the department that you use is concealed inside the middle allocation of the menu, you are out of luck. every time you enter into the menu system, you’ll have to commence from the top (beginning) then move into the section/option you want to change.

- Steadyshot (in-body effigy effigy Coming from Canon where IS is on the lens (and therefore, the effect may be viewed through OVF), I was skeptical of Pentax, Sony, Olympus and other camera producers that place IS function on the imaging sensor itself. Whether one is superior than the other is a whole different topic of discussion. Knowing that a33/a55 is EVF/LCD, I automatically assumed that steadyshot effect may be seen through EVF/LCD with every lens I put on. THIS IS NOT TRUE. For whatsoever reason, neither EVF or the LCD displays the anti-shake effect. It only tells you that Steadyshot is on through a mere 5-bar indicator on the side of the EVF. Because both EVF/LCD receives data directly from the sensor, I thought WYSWIG – the exposure, dynamic range, color, and steadyshot.

- Lack of manual control for the duration of video. whether or not you want to take vantage of the phase detection AF during video, everything else must in addition be controlled by the camera. There’s no way for you to set the speed, ISO, and most importantly, the aperture. That last portion is critical since your HD video will look no different than any compact that in addition takes HD video whether or not you can’t control the aperture (depth of field). Why Sony wouldn’t concede these manual settings to be controlled by user is beyond me. I doubt these will have meaningful impact in AF, unless the aperture is so small that no sufficient light falls on the AF sensor, in which case, Sony ought to at least give the users an option to pick either (the AF) or (aperture). Anyway, this is a huge let down from my point of view.

- Buffer clearing time amid shoots. I am honestly puzzled by this one. Sony has provided the public with this awesome, state of the art applied science (translucent) imposed into imaging earth that could potentially be as significant as when SLR’s primary turned digital. Yet, the effigy processing engine is to an outstanding degree slow. What’s the point of capturing 7 fps images when you have to wait 40 seconds afterwards until the camera becomes totally functional (normal) again? I don’t grasp why Sony didn’t bother to upgrade the processor/imaging algorithms when they proudly put 7 fps constant AF shooting as one of the main headliner. I’ve heard a55 is even slower with it is 10 fps shooting. When shooting RAW at greatest or most complete or best possible 6 fps (for both a55 and a33), things are even slower and your buffer fills up after when it comes to 10 shots or so. And yes, I was using one of the fastest SDHC cards available – the transcend class 10 16gb card. So unless you have a lot of longanimity and don’t mind your camera freezing for 40+ seconds after rigorous action-catching shots, you’ll have numerous serious problem and may potentially miss a good deal of opportunities.

- fixed overall customization. I didn’t anticipate this camera to provide the kind of customization that I got from Canon 7D. After all, there is a price divergence of with regards to a grand. Nonetheless, a swell deal of entry DSLR’s these days that a33/a55 supposedly ought to be competing, offers a outstanding deal of more pragmati customization choices for users of varying demands. A33/a55 is so limited in customization that you get started to wonder whether you’re keeping a aps-c sensored interchangeable lens camera. The menu and setup choices are very very basic (if that). I think Canon powershot G11 provides more customization than a33. For example, underneath video, one of the most intriguing features that individuals would purchase this camera for, you basically have two formats. Either HD or VGA. No control over frame rate or any other combinings whether or not using AVCHD format, your only option is 1920x1080i. whether or not using MPEG, your choices are 1440×1080 or standard VGA (I think 640×480). That’s it is Those are your ONLY options. All other areas pretty much lack control and customization alike to video format. Talk regarding letting your camera to take control of YOUR shooting…

- Lack of choices and limited display data. Here’s an example – not being capable to set ISO in 1/3 increment is one thing. Not DISPLAYING the ISO just because you’re in automati ISO mode is just lame. I realise the range is between 100 and 1600, but when in auto ISO, the display just says “AUTO ISO”. there’s no way what ISO the camera is choosing until after you’ve taken the shot and reviewing the effigy (data).

Again, in spite of these limitations restrictions like frustrations), the camera does deliver in it’s core technology. All the positives mentioned by online reviews are true. If you are graduating from compacts, this camera, by all means, would make an excellent DSLR alternatives However, those of you who are more experienced DSLR shooters drawn into a33/a55 because of its new technology, my counsel is to wait a little longer until Sony comes up with a SLT model that is geared more towards the enthusiast/prosumer market. I heard rumors that early portion of 2011 Sony will apply its translucent engineering in the alpha 7 series (a77?) that would potentially address galore of the concerns I’ve pointed out. Just wanted to give everybody a head’s-up.

I got my hands on this to play around waiting for the Nikon D7000. Specs wise you may virtually call it a poorman Nikon D7000 with the almost the same cmos and video mode. genuinely the Nikon D3100 14.2MP is closer to the A33, and the D7000 is closer to the Sony Alpha SLTA55VL. I got to say I have ignored Sony DSLR since they came into the market after buying out Minolta. I would like to say after playing with this camera, I would commend it over all other DSLRs in this price range. In this day and age HD video is a secondary feature to the good old photo shot and this does both very well. I am a Nikon D40 user for 3 years and looking to upgrade to the D7000, but this looks like it might cut in.

Pros:

+Image is way better then my old 6mp D40 in indoor lower lighting. in addition the Macro feature is better then the D40, I may get closer on the A33. The focus is more immediate and is capable to lock in on closer thing and under lower light. my sample effigy effigy stitching option is cool, don’t need a 3rd party software, don’t have a 3d tv to test the 3D feature.

+I like the leveler a lot, older camera didn’t in truth have this, but most new one do.

+The buttons are very responsive and not hard to push like on such a outstanding deal of camera.

+Movie mode is phenomenal. When you move around the autofocus is very fast, because of the Translucent Mirror technology. I have shaky hands, so I hope it had a little better stabilizer, but is on par with Panasonic camcorder. 1980x1080i (60i) AVCHD and 1440x1080p (30fps), The higher resolution does look better. I haven’t edit anything, but both modes were playable on my laptop and better on my PlayStation 3. the comment line below to the link of my test youtube upload.)

+microphone input for movie mode.

+About the same size or littler then the D40

+Built in effigy stabilizer, so Sony lenses are not as expansive as Nikon or other, since you don’t need built in VR. (I can’t live without VR)

+Live View looks very good and the screen may pivot and turn from the bottom.

+Translucent Mirror may manufacture 7fps for A33 and 10fps in the A55 which is amazingly fast and ordinarily found on DSLR in the 2k.

+Also without the mirror flipping up there must be fewer or no dust becoming onto the APS-C HD CMOS sensor.

+I found the color to be accurate, and similar to my Nikon. I had a cybershot once that make color look more vivid, but not as real.

Cons:

-Too galore sub-menus, since there are a lot of choices and mode. I wished they just added more external buttons. Nikon and most older Sony scene settings, like landscape, portrait, macro, etc. are on the dial, here you have to use the sub-menu. in addition wished there was a scroll wheel for both aperture and shutter speed, but there is only one.

-View finder is as well digital, since it isn’t like a typical mirror SLR. Live view will drain battery quicker than the basic prism view finder.

-You may listen the auto-focus in common and movie recording.

-Sony needs to step it up and include 1980x1080p at yeast 24fps like most other DSLR.

Neutral

-It is very light equated to Nikon, built quality feels good.

-Auto HDR, it layers 3 photos into one to get a better photo, no plan to use it much.

Typical features input/output: hdmi, usb, sd card

-29min max movie clip(most DSLR don’t have built-in fan to cool the sensor down)

-No GPS here, yes on A55. Nice to have, but doesn’t matter much.

I came away very impressed. This is a must purchase if you are new to DSLR. Most camera internet sites gave this/A55 a outstanding review. It takes outstanding photo easy and the video is good enough, not perfect, but still better than any Canon or Nikon in this price range. I just have too a heap of lenses from Nikon to switch to Sony. But if the D7000 is not too much better, I’ll just get this and the18-200mm lenses, which still be 150 fewer expensively than the D7000 (I acknowledge D700 focus and ISO are much better). Most cameras at similar price range takes great picture, it is the interface and option is what keep most individuals patrioti to one brand, and I still like Nikon interface.

Sony A33=to Sony A560, Same specs but the A33 has a Translucent Mirror the other is normal SLR, same as Sony A55= Sony A580.

I purchased the a33 after owning an a300 for a couple years and it’s a nice upgrade. The build quality is when it comes to the same as the a300, which is a little plasticky but for the most part solid sentiment with good balance. Physically it’s smaller/lighter than the a300 but still is easy to handle for those with medium-sized hands (if you have giant sausage fingers you may have issues). The buttons are better arranged and the screen is larger/sharper with better tilting/rotation.

The main reason for my upgrading was for the video recording and I am very satisfied with this. Since the a300 doesn’t have video recording I can’t compare it to another DSLR, but equated to my point-n-shoot HD camera this is awesome. Being competent to control the depth of field on videos is great and the auto focus is very fast, but occasionally hunts a littler You definitely listen the focus motor turning on the video if you’re recording a quiet scene but it’s not terrible. If you’re outside with ambient noises (cars, wind, random noises) you scarcely listen it is The mic jack is a regular audio jack so you may use any third party mic and this will have to eliminate the focus noise and would be worth looking into. You may in addition use manual focus and then there is no noise from zooming/focusing.

Photos are reasonably better than the a300. There is less noise at high ISO settings and AUTO ISO now will go up to 1600, equated to only 400 on the a300; this must assist a good bit in low light conditions. It focuses rapidly and without delay and more accurate than the a300 and the a33 will shoot much more quickly in uninterrupted shooting mode as well. The panoramic setting is great as well and works reliably and quickly, just push the shutter button once and rotate the camera quickly towards the direction designated on the screen in one smooth motion motion recording a video) and the camera does the rest; there is no aligning ghost images one at a time like I’ve seen on other panoramic enabled cameras.

Other than cited above the a33 is pretty much the same as the a300 in most respects. I’ve employed it with numerous Minolta glass and it’s worked well so there are no issues I recognise of in regards to compatibility. It’s like the a300 but faster, sharper, more comfortable to use, has video, is lighter and a little smaller. The only real negative I have noticed equated to the a300 is the battery doesn’t last as long (but not too bad), so a 2nd battery pack is somewhat mandatory if you’d like to go out and shoot for a full day.

All in all it’s a great camera and I’m happy with its However if you don’t in truth need video or high-speed constant shooting the older/traditional alpha DSLR cameras would be a good alternative for a little less money.

I got my hands on this to play around waiting for the Nikon D7000. Specs wise you may almost call it a poorman Nikon D7000 with the almost the same cmos and video mode. in truth the Nikon D3100 14.2MP is closer to the A33, and the D7000 is closer to the Sony Alpha SLTA55VL. I got to say I have ignored Sony DSLR since they came into the market after buying out Minolta. I would like to say after playing with this camera, I would commend it over all other DSLRs in this price range. In this day and age HD video is a secondary feature to the good old photo shot and this does both very well. I am a Nikon D40 user for 3 years and looking to upgrade to the D7000, but this looks like it might cut in.

Pros:

+Image is way better then my old 6mp D40 in indoor lower lighting. as well the Macro feature is better then the D4, I may get closer on the A33. The focus is quicker and is able to look in on closer thing and under lower light. (see my same in image)

+Panoramic stitching option is cool, don’t need a 3rd party software, don’t have a 3d tv to test the 3D feature.

+I like the leveler a lot, older camera didn’t in truth have this, but most new one do.

+The buttons are very responsive and not hard to push like on such a heap of camera.

+Movie mode is phenomenal. When you move around the autofocus is very fast, because of the Translucent Mirror technology. I have shaky hands, so I hope it had a little better stabilizer, but is on par with Panasonic camcorder. 1980x1080i (60i) AVCHD and 1440x1080p (30fps), The higher resolution does look better. I haven’t edit anything, but both modes were playable on my laptop and better on my PlayStation 3. (See the comment line below to the link of my test youtube upload.)

+microphone input for movie mode.

+About the same size or smaller then the D40

+Built in image stabilizer, so Sony lenses are not as expansive as Nikon or other, since you don’t need built in VR. (I can’t live without VR)

+Live View looks very good and the screen may pivot and turn from the bottom.

+Translucent Mirror may formulate 7fps for A33 and 10fps in the A55 which is amazingly fast and ordinarily found on DSLR in the 2k.

+Also without the mirror flipping up there must be less or no dust becoming onto the APS-C HD CMOS sensor.

+I found the color to be accurate, and similar to my Nikon. I had a cybershot once that make color look more vivid, but not as real.

Cons:

-Too a great deal of sub-menus, since there are a lot of choices and mode. I wished they just added more external buttons. Nikon and most older Sony scene settings, like landscape, portrait, macro, etc. are on the dial, here you have to use the sub-menu. Also wished there was a scroll wheel for both aperture and shutter speed, but there is only one.

-View finder is also digital, since it isn’t like a typical mirror SLR. Live view will drain battery more quickly than the basic prism view finder.

-You may hear the auto-focus in frequent and movie recording.

-Sony needs to step it up and include 1980x1080p at yeast 24fps like most other DSLR.

Neutral

-It is very light equated to Nikon, built quality feels good.

-Auto HDR, it layers 3 photos into one to get a better photo, no plan to use it much.

Typical features input/output: hdmi, usb, sd card

-29min max movie clip(most DSLR don’t have built-in fan to cool the sensor down)

-No GPS here, yes on A55. Nice to have, but doesn’t matter much.

I came away very impressed. This is a must purchase if you are new to DSLR. Most camera sites gave this/A55 a great review. It takes great photo easy and the video is good enough, not perfect, but still better than any Canon or Nikon in this price range. I just have too a good deal of lenses from Nikon to switch to Sony. But if the D7000 is not too much better, I’ll just get this and the18-200mm lenses, which still be 150 cheaper than the D7000 (I know D700 focus and ISO are much better). Most cameras at similar price range takes great picture, it is the interface and option is what keep most humans loyal to one brand, and I still like Nikon interface.

Sony A33=to Sony A560, Same specs but the A33 has a Translucent Mirror the other is normal SLR, same as Sony A55= Sony A580.

I purchased this camera but returned it to upgrade to the Sony Alpha SLTA55. The cameras are very close so I will post here and on the A55 page as well.

Some background will help others grasp my comments: I had a Panasonic FZ30 for five years. I liked everything in regards to that camera except it had its limits and that was what I was looking for – something that would be equal but remove the limits. For your reference the FZ30 is an 8mp camera with a 35-420mm fixed lens, swivel 2″ LCD, built in flash. It is considered a “bridge” camera that falls among mega-zooms and DSLRs. So I’m not coming from a position of having a DSLR with galore more features or a full frame sensor. I receive pleasure from photography but just for casual and family use, no publishing for me. Just snapshots.

The three things I was looking for typically were better image quality, better video, and better low light capability. The Sony Alpha A33/A55 definitely addressed those issues, and there are a bunch of very interesting features I wasn’t looking for but am glad to have.

First this camera has an ASP-C sized sensor, the same size employed in a lot of more spectacular DSLR cameras. It isn’t “Full Frame” but it is way more spectacular than my Panasonic FZ30 sensor. That more spectacular sensor made all the divergence in the earth when it comes to photo quality. At 14 megapixels in the A33 and 16 megapixels in the A55 I find the image quality is so good I haven’t felt the need to sharpen any of my photos on the PC. Also I may now crop (zoom) on the PC and still have a high quality image.

The low light capability of this camera is superb. I now may take good photos in low light where my FZ30 couldn’t even perform. It goes all the way to ISO 12,800 (the FZ30 went to 400), and may mimic 25,600 in a hand kept twilight mode that I find works rather well.

As far as video this camera is also superb.

So it solved the three issues I had with the older camera.

I genuinely don’t like changing lenses. I had that experience 30 years ago with a Canon A1 film camera and don’t want to do that again. So I purchased the Sony 18-250mm (27-375 equivalent) zoom lens and that I just leave on all the time. This means I may go broad angle to zoom over a 14X range, never adjust lenses, and don’t have to worry with regards to the pesky sensor dust problem of interchangeable lenses.

This camera is regarding 1/2 pound heavier than my FZ30 but after a while I didn’t observe that. It isn’t without its errors though. First Sony simply made the grip too small. It is annoying but I’ll live with its Second, as with a lot of digital cameras in this genre, the sensor can overheat and shut the camera down. This might occur on hot days when you are attempting to shoot long videos. Videos of 2-3 minutes are no difficulties I don’t take videos longer than that so this isn’t an issue for me.

There are a good amount of comments when it comes to battery life being short but it is longer than my FZ30 so I’m happy. I found on a two week vacation in France that I never had to use the spare battery in my pocket once. I took over 1,200 photos over 10 days, sometimes 300 in one day, and never ran the battery down below 50%.

Pros:

- Very fast auto focus.

- Translucent mirror engineering science allows focus during video.

- Awesome low light performance

- Awesome video

- Very useful “handheld twilight mode” to take handheld photos in very low light. Takes 6 shots and combined them.

- Awesome High Dynamic Range (HDR) feature that brackets three shots and assembles them. This was great in France when the sky had clouds with vivid sunlight on the edges that blew out the highlights. The HDR mode took three shots and combined them, lessoning the sky highlights and improving the detail of the darker branches of the scene. I utilized it a lot.

- 6/10 frames per second, great for moving objects like kids or sports.

- Panorama mode (but I don’t use this much)

- Too galore other features to mention (see review on dpreview.com)

- Very sharp and clear 3″ LCD

- Much better EVF than my FZ30

Cons:

- Small grip – and there is no good reason it couldn’t have been bigger without compromising the compact nature of the camera.

- Not good if you intend to take long videos.

Should you purchase the A33 or the A55. In my opinion, and for my use, I think the A33 would have been fine. I did the upgrade for one reason only and that was galore charts that showed the low light noise was less on the A55. You get 2 more mega pixels but I just don’t think that is important.

The A55 has a GPS feature that marks the images with the emplacement coordinates but I found this feature didn’t work well. As with any GPS it takes time to sync up with satellites. However if I turn the camera on, take three or four quick shots and turn it off the GPS never syncs and it records the defective location.

The A55 goes up to 10 frames per second while the A33 goes to six. I suppose there are a few instances when that might make a differences

The Sony a33 is an easy no-brainer recommendation, exceptionally for the entry-level “SLR” user, but actually also for the more experienced photographer. There is no real need for me here to reproduce all the micro-detail that you can read in regards to the a33, and its “bigger brother,” the a55, both of which are categorized as “SLT” (single lens translucent) designs, not “SLR” (single lens reflex) — a resurrection of a engineering science employed first by Canon a good deal of years ago — but I can throw in a few pragmati items I’ve cited items from my own field testing of the camera that may be of such a good deal of use if you’re taking into account this camera.

Pros – Things I’ve liked so far:

+1. High build quality – the camera feels “tight” and well-built

+2. progressed sensor applied science that permits a slew of modern photographic and video choices not available on most any other SLR (“hand-held twilight mode,” 7 frames per second shooting, noise reduction mode using layers of sequential photographs, automatic panoramic stitching, etc.)

+3. EXCEPTIONALLY good price (the a33 can be found right now at $600, and other sales may soon follow; I’m veritably surprised Sony did not release these at the $1,500 price point)

+4. Small and lightweight equated to equal competitors

+5. Uses both SDHC/SDXC and Sony Memory Stick – you are no longer locked in the Memory Stick world, if you don’t care to be

+6. Large, elaborate screen (1 million pixels)

+7. Electronic viewfinder with 1 million pixels – this engineering may strength a rethinking of the “optical” prismatic design applied in most formal DSLRs

+8. Articulated screen – and it’s big, too ( 3 inches)

+9. “alpha” lens mount opens the world of Zeiss lenses to you, if you want to go that route

+10. Sony has lately freed a series of “alpha” mount lenses that are extremely low prices and offer in general good performance (could this be a Sony “first”?) if you don’t want to get into expensive lens options yet

+11. Relatively lightweight battery for its class

+12. Overall, great performance in turn on speed, menu system

+13. INSTANTANEOUS live view focusing for most lenses – unbelievable speed – I’ve not seen any other “DSLR” focus this fast in live view

+14. Built-in help in the menuing system

+15. Great image quality when paired with the right lenses

+16. Comfortable and “grippy” grip

+17. Awesome “horizon level” indicator overlaid on the screen (every camera must have this)

+18. Good control of noise way up into higher ISO levels – 1600 ISO should be very usable, and even higher levels under certain conditions

+19. SUPERB high def video in AVCHD format, and I mean genuinely superb

+20. Sweep panoramic mode actual works (I was skeptical until I tried it for myself – its its – galore things I’m not too wild about:

-1. Somewhat noisy mechanism on shooting – this is not the silent model you have come to expect with point and shoots, and don’t let the translucent technology tranquilize you into thinking the camera is silent during shooting: it’s NOT (even though the mirror does not move, there is noise from the mechanical shutter system)

-2. Battery life perhaps not what we would like to see in this model (you’ll be lucky to get 400 shots on a single battery, and I would not count on more than that, in spite of what you’ve read)

-3. The “alpha” lens set holds numerous superb lenses – the Zeiss and the Sony G’s are shortlisted as amongst the best of any brand – but you still will not have the virtually inexhaustible options offered by brands like Canon and Nikon (although you can get all kinds of Minolta glass in the utilized market that will work fine with this camera, and galore of the Minoltas are dearly loved)

-4. If you are coming from a Sony DSC-R1 with that finelooking f/2.8 lens at 24mm, don’t count on finding that for this camera unless you’re willing to fork out $1,500 for that type of a lens (which also shows what a noteworthy camera the R1 was, one of Sony’s best, ever)

-5. Memory stick slot makes insertion of memory stick difficult at points – you can’t just shove the stick in as usual, but need to cautiously “work” it in – this is a real pain

-6. The small size of the camera may take so numerous getting employed to, specially if you are employed to the big, oversized grips of traditionalisti SLRs (although this may genuinely be an ADVANTAGE, depending on your own preferences)

-7. No depth of field preview in live mode

-8. If you are employed to waist-level shooting with an articulating screen (which is what I loved about the DSC-R1), note that the projection of the viewfinder, though making it much requiring little effort to use, covers up part of your view as you look down to the articulated screen (again, only if you are doing waist-level shooting close to your body)

-9. Reports of overheating, though in all probability highly overblown and over reported, are of such a lot of concern (but note that galore of us with the cameras are not reporting this problem, and galore SLRs in truth have the same issue; I have not yet encountered it, but have shot only limited video thus thus Sound on video recordings not that great outstanding videographers will want to look into external microphone options)

A note on the a33 and a55 differences. There are not actually too much to mention heres The cameras are physically identical. One shoots at 10 frames per second, with a more prominent memory buffer, the other, at 7 frames per second. The 155 also adds built-in GPS. The a55 has a somewhat bigger megapixel count on the sensor. In truth, unless you have a specialized need or requirement, I doubt you’ll see much divergence in the results of the two cameras. Right now there is a world-wide shortage of the a55, and this means you can in all probability get this a33 without much problem, and possibly, on sale!

What I can say here, though, is that if you are an entry level photographer wishing to learn the craft, the a33/a55 are in all probability the most easygoing recommendations I can make. They are high quality, high performance, and very inexpensive. They offer fantastic, computer based options choices such a good deal of that I’ve listed above), and because the camera is still roughly physically modeled in the conventional SLR scheme, the cameras can serve as an entry point to genuinely learning how to shoot. But that’s not to say these cameras are only for amateurs – they surely are not – because the platform is sufficient to turn out such a great deal of veritably great photos. The camera is also fun to utilized It offers the features of the large units in a much smaller and lighter package, and you just can’t say enough about the capacity to have an articulated screen (many people really like this for shooting video, but I use it rather a bit in still photography.)

I’ve been purchasing Sony instrumentation for many, numerous years, and I’ve watched in horror with such a heap of of the things that has been done with the Sony line over the years. These a33/a55 cameras genuinely represent “real” Sony productions in the Sony tradition. They are groundbreaking technical devices, are built very well, and seem like they will last a long time while turning out good performance. That they are so reasonably priced (some might even say cheap) is just icing on the cake. Five stars for technology, five stars for build, five stars for price.

Some Lenses of Interest:

Sony SAL-1680Z 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T DT Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Camera

Sony SAL70300G 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 SSM ED G-Series Compact Super Telephoto Zoom Lens

Sony 24 -70mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Cameras

Sony SAL18250 Alpha DT 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 High Magnification Zoom Lens w/Lens Hood

Sony SAL30M28 30mm f/2.8 Lens for Alpha Digital SLR Cameras

The Sony a33 is an easy no-brainer recommendation, specially for the entry-level “SLR” user, but actually also for the more experienced photographer. There is no real need for me here to reproduce all the micro-detail that you can read about the a33, and its “bigger brother,” the a55, both of which are categorized as “SLT” (single lens translucent) designs, not “SLR” (single lens reflex) — a resurrection of a technology employed first by Canon many years ago — but I can throw in a few practical items I’ve noted items from my own field testing of the camera that may be of numerous use if you’re considering this camera.

Pros – Things I’ve liked so far:

+1. High build quality – the camera feels “tight” and well-built

+2. Advanced sensor technology that permits a slew of advanced photographic and video options not available on most any other SLR (“hand-held twilight mode,” 7 frames per second shooting, noise reduction mode using layers of sequential photographs, automatic panoramic stitching, etc.)

+3. EXCEPTIONALLY good price (the a33 can be found right now at $600, and other sales may soon follow; I’m truly surprised Sony did not release these at the $1,500 price point)

+4. Small and lightweight compared to equivalent competitors

+5. Uses both SDHC/SDXC and Sony Memory Stick – you are no longer locked in the Memory Stick world, if you don’t care to be

+6. Large, detailed screen (1 million pixels)

+7. Electronic viewfinder with 1 million pixels – this technology may strength a rethinking of the “optical” prismatic design employed in most conventional DSLRs

+8. Articulated screen – and it’s big, too ( 3 inches)

+9. “alpha” lens mount opens the world of Zeiss lenses to you, if you want to go that route

+10. Sony has not long back released a series of “alpha” mount lenses that are extremely low prices and offer generally good performance (could this be a Sony “first”?) if you don’t want to get into expensive lens options yet

+11. Relatively lightweight battery for its class

+12. Overall, great performance in turn on speed, menu system

+13. INSTANTANEOUS live view focusing for most lenses – incredible speed – I’ve not seen any other “DSLR” focus this fast in live view

+14. Built-in help in the menuing system

+15. Great image quality when paired with the right lenses

+16. Comfortable and “grippy” grip

+17. Awesome “horizon level” indicator overlaid on the screen (every camera should have this)

+18. Good control of noise way up into higher ISO levels – 1600 ISO should be very usable, and even higher levels under certain conditions

+19. SUPERB high def video in AVCHD format, and I mean REALLY superb

+20. Sweep panoramic mode actual works (I was skeptical until I tried it for myself – its its – such a good deal of things I’m not too wild about:

-1. Somewhat noisy mechanism on shooting – this is not the silent model you have come to expect with point and shoots, and don’t let the translucent technology tranquilize you into thinking the camera is silent during shooting: it’s NOT (even though the mirror does not move, there is noise from the mechanical shutter system)

-2. Battery life perhaps not what we would like to see in this model (you’ll be lucky to get 400 shots on a single battery, and I would not count on more than that, in spite of what you’ve read)

-3. The “alpha” lens set contains such a good deal of superb lenses – the Zeiss and the Sony G’s are rated as amongst the best of any brand – but you still will not have the virtually unlimited options offered by brands like Canon and Nikon (although you can get all kinds of Minolta glass in the utilized market that will work fine with this camera, and many of the Minoltas are dearly loved)

-4. If you are coming from a Sony DSC-R1 with that finelooking f/2.8 lens at 24mm, don’t count on finding that for this camera unless you’re willing to fork out $1,500 for that type of a lens (which also shows what a notable camera the R1 was, one of Sony’s best, ever)

-5. Memory stick slot makes insertion of memory stick difficult at points – you can’t just shove the stick in as usual, but need to cautiously “work” it in – this is a real pain

-6. The small size of the camera may take such a lot of getting used to, specially if you are used to the big, oversized grips of traditionalisti SLRs (although this may actually be an ADVANTAGE, depending on your own preferences)

-7. No depth of field preview in live mode

-8. If you are used to waist-level shooting with an articulating screen (which is what I loved about the DSC-R1), note that the projection of the viewfinder, though making it much posing no difficulty to use, covers up part of your view as you look down to the articulated screen (again, only if you are doing waist-level shooting close to your body)

-9. Reports of overheating, though probably highly overblown and over reported, are of galore concern (but note that many of us with the cameras are not reporting this problem, and many SLRs actually have the same issue; I have not yet encountered it, but have shot only limited video thus thence Sound on video recordings not that great outstanding videographers will want to look into external microphone options)

A note on the a33 and a55 differences. There are not really too much to mention heres The cameras are physically identical. One shoots at 10 frames per second, with a larger memory buffer, the other, at 7 frames per second. The a55 also adds built-in GPS. The a55 has a somewhat larger megapixel count on the sensor. In truth, unless you have a specialized need or requirement, I doubt you’ll see much difference in the results of the two cameras. Right now there is a world-wide shortage of the a55, and this means you can probably get this a33 without much problem, and possibly, on sale!

What I can say here, though, is that if you are an entry level photographer wishing to learn the craft, the a33/a55 are probably the easiest recommendations I can make. They are high quality, high performance, and very inexpensive. They offer fantastic, computer based options options some that I’ve listed above), and because the camera is still roughly physically modeled in the traditional SLR scheme, the cameras can serve as an entry point to really learning how to shoot. But that’s not to say these cameras are only for amateurs – they certainly are not – because the platform is sufficient to turn out some truly great photos. The camera is also fun to employed It offers the features of the big units in a much smaller and lighter package, and you just can’t say enough about the ability to have an articulated screen (many people really like this for shooting video, but I use it rather a bit in still photography.)

I’ve been purchasing Sony equipment for many, many years, and I’ve watched in horror with some of the things that has been done with the Sony line over the years. These a33/a55 cameras truly represent “real” Sony productions in the Sony tradition. They are groundbreaking technological devices, are built very well, and seem like they will last a long time while turning out good performance. That they are so reasonably priced (some might even say cheap) is just icing on the cake. Five stars for technology, five stars for build, five stars for price.

Some Lenses of Interest:

Sony SAL-1680Z 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T DT Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Camera

Sony SAL70300G 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 SSM ED G-Series Compact Super Telephoto Zoom Lens

Sony 24 -70mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Cameras

Sony SAL18250 Alpha DT 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 High Magnification Zoom Lens w/Lens Hood

Sony SAL30M28 30mm f/2.8 Lens for Alpha Digital SLR Cameras

If you’re a newbie like me and can afford it, purchase this one! Huge improvement over point-n-shoot, and for those of you who are like I was a few weeks ago, know this, that megapixels have zip to do with quality – it’s the size of the sensor, and this one has the best in this class. After searching and reading online continuously to attempt to make the best educated decision I could, I decisive it was between this one and the Canon Rebel EOS. Went into my local camera store to buy where I could get real expertise expertise like at Best Buy), told the guy (who turned out to be incredibly fantastically only that I wanted the Canon, for one of the features I liked best was the customizable self-timer (3 shots in a row) which the Sony doesn’t have (only 1 at a time like most). He then said I made a great choice, that there are only two cameras in that price range that are both best in class, that one and this Sony A33; I thought, wow, I had obviously done some good homework! He illustrated for me how when utilizing virtually anything on the Canon, including live view, the fps were very, very slow – I said no way! He then showed me how the Sony snaps 7 fps virtually no matter what, even with live view, and still fast with flash though I can’t recall if 7 or not.

Pros:

Fast fps, even with live view and flash on

High quality images in viewfinder

Excellent auto-modes, with lots of flexibility to custommake as learn more

Amazingly clear, crisp photos

Great quality movie mode

Cons:

Lens cap doesn’t have a tether, frustrating

Wish I could go into more detail, but I’ve only had it for 2 weeks and can scarcely realise all the things this thing can do even automatically, much less manually, have only used it like a novice, home user would thus far but wow, awesome little puppy, I really like it is

Coby 7 Inch Widescreen Digital Dp732

Only $35.99 @ Amazon

Rated 3 of 5 Stars by 21 Buyers!

Coby 7 Inch Widescreen Digital Dp732

While Coby may not be a premium brand when it comes to electronics, I have bought rather a few of these units and so far so good. This is a nice versatile photoframe and will run smoothly all over the day, whether or not you have placed it on your desk at the office.

What’s Included:

- Photoframe

- Kickstand

- Power Adapter

- Manual

Specifications:

- Display size: 7″ widescreen TFT LCD (approx. 3.5″ h x 6″ w)

- File Format: JPEG only

- Resolution: 480 x 234 pixels

- Functionality: Calendar and Clock with Alarm timer

- Mode: Photo Slideshow / Browser

- Display Functions: Rotate / Zoom

- Card Slots: SD, MMC, MS

- USB Ports: Full size and Mini 5-pin

- Built-in Memory: 1 MB

- Mounting: Wall Mountable with detachable stand

- Power consumption: <= 3.5 watts

This photoframe allows you to customize the way your pictures are displayed, here are the items that may be adjusted:

- Display ratio

- Slideshow duration

- Slideshow repeat

- Slideshow transition effects

The operation of this photoframe is as easy as a snap. Just stick in either a Flash Drive or a Memory card with your JPEG files and you are all set to go. In my sentiment this will make a outstanding gift.

The picture frame works, good, the transition of pictures is smooth. Only con’s is that, the angle of observing is not great, you will see it as a negative film when viewed at more than 40deg.

Similarly smaller pics are enlarged to the screen size which causes images to be shown in blocks. The resolution too is low, but is not much noticeable.

This digital photo frame is the simplist to use product! I do and have commended this one! I bought another brand at another merchant and it was a junk so I returned it and bought this one and I am very satisfied with the product and beside that I saved cash with this digital photo frame by Colby as it was fewer expensive! I have never written a review before but felt I ought to because this product deserves it is

My mother-in-law spends in regards to a third of her time in her home and the rest on the road in an RV. Now that grandchildren are coming she has been printing pictures off Facebook and carrying them around in her purse. We decisive to update her with something that could hold a outstanding deal of pictures and be easily transferred from house to RV.

The good: The frame looks nice and not cheap, which was a huge concern because she’s really into decorating. The picture quality is in addition good, all of the ones we loaded were taken off of relatives’ Facebook albums and they all look beauteous good. Even the pictures in the slide show that aren’t rotated to be viewed at biggest size are recognizable.

The not so good: The menu is a small clunky, though no worse than the old button menus for tube televisions, so any individual with any experience with those must be capable to figure things out. Anyone else can still in all probability get the hang of it by just playing around for awhile.

We could not get the frame to recognize the USB at first, then it only recognized in regards to 20 of the 126 photos that were on the USB. There is beautiful much no help available online. You have to call the company and they are not open on Sundays.

That being said, we did get everything working in the end, and here are the tips to do it.

1. A USB needs to be formatted in FAT or FAT32, whether or not the USB isn’t working the primary thing to do is reformat it on the computer. Remember that this will erase all info on the USB, so back it up first.

2. For the pictures that weren’t showing properly, I opened them with a basic editing program, tweaked them a bit, then saved them again with a dissimilar name in JPEG format. The newly saved images all showed up fine. I don’t recognise whether or not the tweaking was indispensable to make them work, but as long as they were up, I figured, why not? They look that much nicer in the frame.

Digital Frames still aren’t what one would call cheap, so whether or not you’re more than willing to put in the extra work this one is pretty good if you don’t have a lot of money to spend. I’ve never tried another one so I can’t give any comparisons.

This is a nice and simple photo frame and for the price, it serves its intents Would order another or recommend to others.

Not the largest but it is a decent digital frame, Mom loved it!

It works as specified, the only thing I wish it had, randow slideshow display.

This is not a high end merchandise So if you want something cheap, this is it.

It was a gift to my Mom, she said that is easy of use and the resolution are very good!

The digital photo frame was very easy to set up. IT was as well very easy to employed I gave two of these Frames for gifts and both families just love them. Thanks for the great products

This is a nice buy for the price! It is beautiful out of the box and easy to assemble as well. Instructions are understandable, with ease of applied I purchased an further and added 4GB card, so I am planning on enjoying this for a long time.

Yes, it could be worse, but for the price and current applied science this photo frame ought to do more and do it better. The picture quality gets better the farther away from the frame you get! Up close the lines or graininess of the screen is evident. The screen is too broad or something for regular camera photos. If you choose Full Screen mode it stretches the picture sideways to fill the screen, distorting the initial image. Maybe its configured for stitched panorama photos? Not certain what type of typical photo would make use of the entire projection surface without distorting the photo. Also, while slide transitions can be randomly generated, the slides themselves are shown in the order placed on the SD card, each time. Boring. That alone makes this looking at frame scarcely adequate. The frame itself is beautiful wood-like finish, so that deserves positive marks, and the support stand is simple and efficient at allowing you to alter the angle of view to optimize picture viewing. The memory card options are usual with other frames. The power supply cord could be longer for reaching down from fireplace mantels or other comparatively high perches. The ability to alter several of the picture attributes, like brightness, contrast, back light, etc., is another plus. I got this as a gift and would never buy it, but its OK if you can’t find or afford better quality and features.

Celestron 31042 Astromaster Reflector Telescope

Only $190.00 @ Amazon

Rated 4 of 5 Stars by 9 Buyers!

Celestron 31042 Astromaster Reflector Telescope

I bought this as my introductory telescope to explore the sky and I am VERY pleased. It’s a high quality scope, and the mount and tripod are the kind you get with higher end models. Mine came with an faulty piece, I contacted the Celestron, and I had a new piece in 3 days. Very nice service. I to had troubles finding stars at first, so I went to an astronomy forum and found out the rectify way to do its From there, I haven’t had a problem finding anything.

The 2 main things are 1) calibrate your finder primary and 2) use the right eye piece when looking for something (this scope comes with a 10mm and a 20mm, so you would want to use the 20 to find and 10 to magnify once you found what it is your looking for). I have found Astronomy is not a hobby where you can easily learn stuff through trial and error, and most frustration comes when you undertake just that.

The only thing it’s missing out is an eyepiece that goes to it’s full magnification. I’m buying a 5mm for this, but if they included that, they would have to up the costly So all in all, this in my persuasion is the best bang for the buck telescope out there for beginners on a budget!

I purchased this as a Christmas gift for myself and my 7 year old son (OK, largely for me). It’s put together very well. As a Newtonian, its hollow, which makes it feel reasonably odd, but surely doesn’t have that “plasticy” feel. Feels nice and sturdy. The stand is outstanding and makes for an overall good setup. It’s been cloudy all over all of January, so we haven’t had much risk to in truth use it is We did manage to get out and find Mars for the duration of a rare (albeit cold) clear night. The finder scope is nearly totally unlikely to use, though. We expended with regards to an hour just attempting to point it at Mars, and by the time we got the planet aligned with the scope I couldn’t seem to be competent to adjust the finder scope to genuinely be useful. I’ll play with the finder scope more on a warmer night – perchance I’m just doing it faulty Overall, though, I’m quite satisfied. A definitive upgrade from the “toy” telescope I purchased from a section store years ago. Also, it just looks like a scientific instrument – so much so that my wife doesn’t mind it standing quietly on display in the corner of our living room. course, we’re both aerospace engineers, so our tastes for decor may be a bit different than the norm.)

The telescope was definitely easy to configured with the quick setup guide, was ready to go in 15 minutes. We looked at the moon initial with the 20mm supplied lens, saw a good amount of detail, craters etc. The user manual could be simplified a bit associated to more of the technical setup/balancing methods.

The second night out we viewed Jupiter and at least 3 of the 4 moons with the supplied 10mm eyepiece after initially becoming it into the field of view with the 20mm eye piece. The Jupiter images looked white, will probably have to add filters and a different eye piece to the set in order to fetch out more of the color and gas cloud bands of Jupiter.

This is our original family telescope and the kids genuinely take delight in its

I purchased this telescope and tried to take it out the initial night, and couldn’t get anything is view beside blurry lights. I turns out that the mirrors were not lined up decently but after serching on google I found a tip to take a 35mm film container and poke a small hole in the middle of the bottom and insert it in the eyepiece to line up the mirrors and I then lined them up in in regards to a minute. After that images were good and clear. The sighing scope is not very good it doesn’t seem to remain sighted in with the scope. purchased mine with a lense and filter kit and a soft case, all high quality moon filter is a require to unless you want blinded by a full moon. All and all a good scope and I am very happy with its

This item was a good purchase for our 10-year old, especially at the reduced price I paid. Set up was reasonably unmanageable for a beginner, and the weights provided were not sufficient to totally balance the telescope. However, good enough if you keep in mind that’s not wholly balanced. When the said up was complete it looked great and worked well.

The major problem we have is locating the stars…even when we seem to have the telescope pointing straight at a star, haven’t been able to locate them. The powerseeker is of fixed assists I presume this will come with experience.

Overall a good buy.

I bought this telescope for my 12 yr old son who already has two smaller telescopes. The set-up is a small confusing, but once we figured it out, it was worth buying. It is huge and a little heavy but the view of the moon and stars are amazing!! Well worth it!!

This scope may be fine for low power terrestrial viewing, but the mount is way too spindly for any high power celestial work. The star finder is beauteous much a joke as well, I guess that’s why the better telescopes use an actual finder scope. When I firstborn got it the optics were so far out of alignment I had to purchase a collimation tool and set it up before I could even use it is The interior of the tube was as well full of plastic flash and other debris and had to be cleaned out. If I wanted a telescope kit, I would have bought one.

The bottom line is, you get what you compensate for. So do yourself a favor, spend more and get more. For ease of use, get the largest Dobsonian scope you can afford and just take delight in it is

I bought this telescope so my daughter and I could look at the moon and a few planets while camping and it works OK. This is my first time with any kind of telescope so I didn’t know what to expect. It’s a little tedious to get the internet site and keep it there, it seems to want to creep. The included lenses, guess that’s what they’re called, are fair, they’re clear but not as sharp as I hoped. The good news is we were able to find the moon within 10 min and the sight was gorgeous incredible. My daughter’s only seven so she lost interest quick but she was happy with it and kept coming back for a few hours. I’m going to attempt a new couple lenses and hope that helps. All in all, I’m satisfied with the purchased

Before I go into this review, I never own a telescope before. I tell you, I was looking for a telescope to watch the moon only. For that intention this telescope I think is perfect. Now I purchased this telescope for beneath $130.0 so for that much cash it is a good telescope. Comes with two eyepieces one 20mm and one 10mm I purchased a 2X-3X Meade Barlow lens, to make these eyepieces stronger. If you just use the 20mm eyepiece to find your object (because the red dot star aiming device on it is beautiful much a jokes I spent a lots of time with it, and it was spotted right on the moon, but it wasn’t there in your eyepiece.), and than alter it to the 10mm it is fine. With the 10mm eyepiece the moon is nice clear and sharp. Now when I installed the Barlow lens in with the 10mm eyepiece, even with 2X magnification I had hard time to make the picture sharp and clear. May be I’m not a masters yet, but I think if you go underneath 8mm this telescope will not handle it well. Below 8mm you still will get the picture, large and close, but not as sharp and clear than with the 10mm eyepiece alone. Like I said I’m a beginner so I may made such a great deal of faults here and theres I still will get a 7mm eyepiece just to give an other try. So to get the things short, If you looking for a telescope to watch the moon, than this one is a perfective one for that intentions But I don’t think this telescope will give you such a heap of cool view of the Saturn, or other closer planets. If you want something what will give you pleasurable time to find further planets with a nice view, than save your money to buy something in the 4 digit price category and not the 3 digit.

Simmons Truplex Riflescope Matte Rings

Only $36.42 @ Amazon

Rated 5 of 5 Stars by 8 Buyers!

Simmons Truplex Riflescope Matte Rings

I have been looking for a good quality scope for a Ruger 10/22 rifle. I was not looking to spend more on the scope than the rifle. I looked at Tasco, Bushnell, BSA & Barska. They all had offerings in the target price range, 4x/32mm or 3-9x/32mm. I found a Bushnell that was very impressive but is a model that no one stocks anymore [but still on their webpages]. I was not very impressed with the clarity of the Tasco, BSA or Baarska’s. I started reading a lot of reviews in forums on this scope. The best price was on Amazon, for when it comes to $33 delivered I was skeptical. I obtained it in less than a week in perfective condition and all I can say is WOW! Yes, it is made in CHINA…everything is these days and that’s a whole other topic for me. But it is a actually solid well made scope that gets the occupation done. I love the recticle pattern and focus knob, so many said it was too tight, mine turns with just the right twist resistance. The optic briteness is similiar to a 12 year old nikon I have and like that I in the first place expended virtually $200 on. I’m not saying it is a nikon BUT is in the legendary briteness range of a nikon. I would unquestionably purchase this one again. I’ll post an update as I use it and sight it in.

Bought this scope for a high-powered spring-piston air rifle and it works great. Will be buying a Ruger 10/22 soon and will in all probability put a 3-9X Simmons 22mag scope on that. The picture is of the 3-9X, so make sure you recognise that when you order. This is a 4X FIXED POWER scope. It comes with the mounting rings, which is nice, in particular for the costly Glass is clear and sighting in the scope is easy. So far have put with regards to 80 .177 pellets through rifle and scope is keeping zero.

I as well have a Savage 116 in 7mm Rem Mag with a Simmons 3-9X40 Pro Sport Scope on it that contains zero, though the eye relief isn’t as good as this .22 mag scope, so I am a beautiful large fan of these cheap Simmons scopes.

I’ve been using a 22 Mag scope on my Marlin 60 for years and it has perpetually functioned well. I purchased this one for my new 22 rifle knowing I’d be happy with it is Be heedful when ordering because the picture is not the scope you’re getting. I assumed the scope I purchased had zoom like the one I already had.

I found this scope to be perfective for my 10/22. It worked so well that I got rid of the one on my model 60 and bought another Simmons .22Mag. Not a high price optic for sure, but definitley gets the occupation done. Don’t be leary of the low price, for the effective distances of a .22 LR, this scope is very clear and useable.

Put it on my Remington 552- .22. Easy installation and came with rings. Have not had it out in the field yet but I think it will be a good addition for my aging eyes.

Title says it all. Outstanding clarity for a scope at this price point & quick shipping. Easily one of my most satisfying buys @ Amazon.

Bushnell Digital Stealth Infrared Monocular

Only $369.99 @ Amazon

Rated 3 of 5 Stars by 6 Buyers!

Bushnell Digital Stealth Infrared Monocular

I was at first always kind of worried about becoming a night optics thinking that it was just numerous highpriced mockery that wasn’t worth the money. Well I decided to buy this and just go for it, and was out right astonished and impressed. In complete darkness were I couldn’t see my hand infront of my face or any light in the area, I turned this sucker on and without even useing the iluminator add on could see perfectly. The capacity to modify how bright the light intensity was genuinely helped to so that the picture on the digital screen in the eye piece wasn’t bled whiten I haven’t had the peril to undertake observing something at a distance more than a hondred yards but so far I am really impressed and glad that I purchased it is as well when you turn the spotlight IR on a circular white huh of all that is illuminated appears on the screen.

I cant commend this merchandise The black and white low resolution display is the greatest disfavor of the unit. Firstly, it will take your eye several minutes to get applied to the dark after becoming white light from the display to your eye. When out in the dark, the last thing you want is to get blinded by white light and I may not perceive why Bushnell came up with the b&w display. Secondly the display has low resolution, so details in the environment will not be seen. Thirdly, the display is small. When using the extra infrared illuminator, only things illuminated could be seen, not the surroundings. The on/off switch is placed in such a way that when the unit is in it is carrying bag, one can accidently turn it on, resulting in 6 empty AA-batteris and unoperable monocular. It has took place to me several times that the unit is turned on, when opening its carrying bag. I happen to own Prowler 4.0 X 50mm, also from Bushnell, and that is a much better product (not a perfective one of course), giving you much better resolution and better image.

i do not recamind this produck it is not as goos as my older bushnell night monos

There is only one eyepiece to look through! Any 1st generation 4×50 scope surpasses this cmos based camera. I don’t recommend it for any utilized The only advantage is video output and external power supply input. Don’t buy its

After my experience of this telescope shows that normal and Lech Bahia Alejaddedodha imagination Aleleh Lech Bamstoi required Blunt and ways to ameliorate resourcefulness inaccurate compared with the price raised

Nikon Prostaff Laser Rangefinder Green

Only $314.00 @ Amazon

Rated 5 of 5 Stars by 12 Buyers!

Nikon Prostaff Laser Rangefinder Green

I have compared the Nikon ProStaff Laser Rangefinder 550 to a Nikon Prostaff 440 and a Bushnell Yardage Pro Sport 450, using all three on the same targets.

Note: I have NOT tried these units on a golf course. All three units are made in China.

The Nikon 550 is a very competent laser range finder, and is very alike in ability to the Nikon 440.

The main differences amidst the two are the slightly greater range of the 550 model.

Despite the understatement of the advertising, I have ranged out to 706 yards with the Nikon 550, and 545 yards with the Nikon 440.

Dark trees might be ranged up to with regards to 400 yards with the Nikon 550, and 330 yards with the Nikon 440. Deer may be ranged to 300 yards reliably with both. The 550 model has a exposure of 6X and the 440 unit is 8X and I greatly prefer the 8X view of the Nikon 440.

Both have a diopter adjustment which is adequate for my eyeglass correction of +5 diopters with and without my glasses.

I in addition find the long rubber eyepiece of the 550 unit unmanageable to use if I alter to and from eyeglasses, as I do not like to keep folding the rubber down, and I recognise from experience that you can fold these type of eyepieces only so many times before the rubber (or vinyl) cracks.

Ranging Performance is:

Dark trees: Nikon 550 400 yards, Nikon 440 330 yards

Telephone poles: Nikon 550 430 yards, Nikon 440 360 yards

Deer: unobstructed medium deer, both 300 yards

Dark shrubs: Nikon 550: 400 yards, Nikon 440 350 yards

Light colored buildings: Nikon 550 535 yards, Nikon 440 453 yards

Very reflective targets, eg trucks, Nikon 550 706 yards, Nikon 440 535 yards

They both acquire targets well and range accurately when compared to other units.

I am biased to wards the Nikon 440 unit, because:

1. it is littler and handier

2. It has 8X exposure which I in truth like and use (and need)

2. It is adequate for anything out to 300 yards and many times 400 yards

3 It costs regarding 60 dollars less than the Nikon 550

5. The battery compartment screws down 3 turns and seems better sealed than the 1/4 turn compartment of the Nikon 550

6. The optics are virtually the same on both accept for magnification. Both are clear and bright.

7. Generally, the range is perchance 15 or 20 percent more for the Nikon 550 unit due to the higher laser power (15 watts pulse vs the 8.5 watts pulse of the 440 unit).

Other notes;

The Bushnell Yardage Pro Sport 450 is not anywhere in the same league as the other two, in spite of the price (I paid compensated The Bushnell is simple to use but will not read beyond 230 yards on any but the most reflective target, in spite of what the publicity says. The longest range I could measure with it was 330 yards and that on a reflective sign. This unit is supposed to range up to 800 yards (732 meters)! It will range a tree up to 200 yards as claimed, but the best it will do on medium deer is 140 yards. It is a 4 power monocular, and will range down to 6 yards, the others will range as close as 11 yards (10M). This Bushnell is by far the lowest quality of any unit I have seen. Bushnell claims water resistance, but there are assorted entry points for water, and if the unsealed battery compartment is opened, green circuit board is visible. If the rubber eyepiece protector is got rid of removed too easily) the optics are exposed and vulnerable. There is absolutely not one thing to protect the electronics and optics from water and moisture. That along with very poor arraying capablenesses make this Bushnell Yardage Pro Sport 450 not one thing more than a child’s toy, albeit an costly one.

I purchased this principally for golf. I tried the Nikon 8358 in the range from someone else and was in truth happy with it is Then I came to amazon to undertake to buy one but I found the ProStaff 550 is much better deal so ordered one. I thought the divergence would be just the distance range. For golf, I in truth don’t need 1200 yards. 550 yards would be more than enough for me. However, when I took it to the driving range to try it out, I was extremely disappointed with the ProStaff 550. It was so unmanageable to get the distance, even for flags within 100 yards because it picks up the trees or any objects behind the flag. To me, it’s really useless. For golf, you need to get the callaway LR550, which is in addition made by Nikon and looks precisely the same. However, there is a major difference, which is LR550 added a introductory target mode which displays range to closest target.

I bought this for my golf play. It just works as expected. Compared to my friend;s also priceed bushnell rangefinder, Nikon 550 detects range more quickly and higher success rates. And this is even smaller and lighter also. I’m totally pleased the quality and price of this rangefinder.

I bought this at a big box store and applied it later that day. This unit is light and easy to employed I only wish it had the 8X exposure of the 440 and a Bushnell unit I have applied in the past. This unit works well although and does what a rangefinder is supposed to do, give you the range to an object. I have used it out to 270 yards and it has been able to range off of both highly reflective objects, as well as those that are not very reflective. The dull olive drab green color goes well in the toned down look you might need in the field as well. Recommend this for any individual that just needs distance to target and not a downward or incline angle distance. Note that this does not have a ballistic computer to calculate slope angles in it is It is made for level and flat ranging only. But then at the price $180-200 this is just fine.

If you’re purchasing this for golf, it’s great. However, there’s a trick! You have to practice your aim. Don’t go out on the course the introductory time, purpose at a few flags from 250 yards and expect to get an exact reading on the primary shot.

You will get better, I nearly never miss now. It’s much better than GPS because it’s more precise and you can get distances of objects on the course that wouldn’t be marked on the GPS – like trees. If you still have trouble aiming, just find a bigger target – Aim at a individual on the green.

Great tool, the best option out there and PGA approved!

I’ve seen persons criticize this rangefinder because it’s hard to hit pins when golfing. Well guess what, flagsticks are tiny, of course it’s hard to hit. If you want pin-seeker technology, then pony up the extra $100 and get one that has it! Personally, I just shoot people who are on the green, or shoot the ground near the hole and you’ll get incisively what you need. None of us is Phil Mickelson, 2 yds difference to the hole when you’re 170yds away isn’t going to matter much. And when you’re closer in (where it actually might might it’s having small impact to hit the flag or the ground next to the hole.

I’ve used this on 5 rounds of golf now, and it’s perfect. I find scan mode to be the most utile because it’s easier to recognise when you’ve hit whatever you’re aiming at vs. objects in the background/foreground. The readings are entirely precise and reliable, the casing is lasting and water-proof, and it’s very easy to used It’s been a huge help, even off the tee because so many courses are inaccurate with their signs and scorecards. The magnification is fun too. The laser is good at ranging normal targets from 250+ yds away. I’ve had it over 300+ with no troubles as well, just for fun. It can most likely go farther.

I heard the battery case comes off without apparent effort and gets lost, so I just put a piece of tape over mine when it arrived, and that’s definitely done the trick.

I have the Nikon golf version, and thought that’s what I was buying heres No problem – this has no problem picking up pin flags, traps, whatever. outstanding product at a great expensive

I commonly like Nikon and Zeiss optics. This may not match the $2k lens quality but they’re still very clear.

Keep in mind that I’m only using if for a 100-200 yard range. Maybe if I go out West I’d use the 400+ range, but it’s more likely I’d borrow the guide’s rangefinder or binoculars-with-rangefinder. So, the incline/decline (iD) of the RifleHunter is overkill for me, especially if using slugs on state land and the dropoff would be more dramatic — I still use the distance and compensate.

The 6x is good for me. An 8x would probably wobble too much (I usually have that problem with 10x binoculars anyhow) and 6x is good for 100-200yd.

I haven’t tried submerging it, but I don’t want to tempt fate. They did get a little wet from light rain, but no troubles

This is a bargain rangefinder – the 6x optics are clean, crisp, and clear. The diopter may be adjusted so that the unit can be used without glasses (I wear glasses for astigmatism and have tested this item both ways). I have made repeatable measurements on objects from 11.5 yards to 95 yards. I am waiting to take it to the range as an aid in bore-sighting my Weatherby. I don’t think I’ll be disappointed.

This range finder works as promised.I took it to the rifle range and checked it on the 100 yd target. It told me when I was 1/2yard short,then I moved back 6ft and it registered 102 yds. Can’t wait to use it hunting.

Heavy Tactical Scope Picatinny Accessory

Only $25.00 @ Amazon

Rated 5 of 5 Stars by 1 Buyers!

Heavy Tactical Scope Picatinny Accessory

i put this on dpms lr 308. works outstanding definately heavy responsibility like it says. it is easliy removed from rifle on put back on and scope keeps zero at 100 yds. vender was propmt package arrived without damage.